THE LAW SAYS THAT IF YOU CONTEST THE LAST WILL ACTING EXECUTOR AND NOT PROVEN INCORRECT...THE HEIRS WHO IS CHALLENGING THE EXECUTOR WILL BE DISINHERITED....SO THE JACKSON FAMILY DID NOT TAKE THE RISK....WHY? BECAUSE IN THE FIRST PLACE...THE IMMEDIATE HEIRS ARE THE NEAREST RELATIVE WHICH IS THE CHILDREN OF MICHAEL SINCE THEY ARE MINORS ,THEIR GRANDMOTHER ACTS AS THEIR GUARDIAN...JUDGE BECHKLEOFFE WHO IS HANDLING THE ESTATE CASE DID NOT GAVE THE RIGHTS OF THE JACKSON FAMILY TO INHERIT THE JACKSON ESTATE BUT RATHER CONSIDER AND SIDED THE ILL LAST WILL OF THE 2 THIEVES....WHY??????THE 2 THIEVES ARE NOT RELATIVE AND OUT OF NOWHERE THEY APPEAR AND PRESENTED THE ILL LAST WILL AND THE JUDGE ACCEPTED IT TRUE WITHOUT PROPER INVESTIGATION IF IT IS FAKE....
SO I THINK THE MOVE OF JACKSON FAMILY IS GOOD...THEY ARE HITTING 2 BIRDS IN ONE STONE ...THEY CAN NOT BE FOREVER IN THE SHADOW OF SONY....THEY GET ADDITIONAL INCOME TO PAY ALL THE OBLIGATIONS SO THAT IT WILL NOT INCURRED INTEREST PENALTIES AND AT THE SAME TIME PROVOKE THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE MICHAEL`S ESTATE TO FILE A SUIT AND EVENTUALLY THE GENUITY OF THE ILL LAST WILL BE INVESTIGATED......THE JUDGE AND JURY SHOULD CHALLENGE THE GENUITY OF THE ILL LAST WILL .... FOR THEM TO MAKE A RIGHT AND BALANCE JUDGEMENT ON KATHERINE AND HOWARD.....
THERE`S NO WAY OUT BUT THE TRUTH PREVAILS !!!!!!!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment